Litigation vs Arbitration: What’s Better for Resolving Disputes?

Litigation is a formal legal process that takes place in court and is presided over by a judge, often resulting in a public trial and judgment. Arbitration, on the other hand, is a private dispute resolution method where an independent arbitrator, or panel makes a binding decision outside of the court system.

Deciding between litigation and arbitration to resolve company disputes involving two or a few individuals depends on a few factors. These include the nature of the dispute, your business needs, and your relationship with the other party.

The choice between either does not have to be a tricky process when you engage a corporate lawyer for advice. That said, it is important to understand the differences and what each dispute resolution method is suitable for.

Litigation vs Arbitration at a Glance

Before deciding which route fits your dispute, it helps to see the two side by side.

What is Arbitration?

Arbitration is one of the two common alternative methods for corporate dispute resolution, the other being mediation. The setting is formal, private, and confidential, without a judge or the public present.

A neutral third party, the arbitrator, makes the final decision. This individual is appointed by the parties themselves and typically holds technical, business, or legal expertise relevant to the dispute.

Both parties must comply with the rules they have agreed to, whether under an institution such as the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) or an ad hoc process.

When Should You Choose Arbitration?

Arbitration tends to suit disputes where privacy, flexibility, or an ongoing relationship with the other party matters more than a public court record.

1. The matter is sensitive to your brand reputation

Once a dispute draws public attention, it can compromise the parties’ brand reputation. This may, in turn, negatively impact their business. Since arbitration takes place in a private setting, total confidentiality is maintained. Both parties can protect the integrity of their brand during the dispute resolution process and when it is resolved.

2. You don’t want a rift in your relationship with the other party

Since the arbitrator is collectively appointed and is typically neutral to the law and institutional culture of both parties, the arbitration process is less confrontational than commercial litigation. This avoids the possible breakdown of partnerships necessary to the success of both businesses.

Since maintaining good long-term relationships is crucial in business, the amicable nature of arbitration allows the parties to continue their commercial relationship.

3. You need more time flexibility

When disputing parties choose arbitration, they can dictate the time and date of the procedures. On the other hand, litigation will require adherence to strict court schedules. For those who need more flexibility in setting aside time for dispute resolution while running a company, arbitration will be a suitable option.

Also Read: Arbitration: A Comprehensive Guide to Alternative Dispute Resolution in Singapore

What is Litigation?

Litigation involves companies or individuals taking their dispute to court for a judge to determine. Common examples include breach of contract, negligence, defamation, and misrepresentation.

In Singapore, claims are generally heard by the State Courts, with the High Court hearing commercial matters exceeding S$250,000. Court proceedings are not confidential.

When Should You Choose Litigation?

Litigation becomes the more appropriate route when the relationship cannot be preserved, when the outcome needs to set a precedent, or when arbitration is simply not on the table.

1. Your relationship with the other party has irretrievably broken down

It becomes less likely that the parties would agree to resolve the dispute amicably or even amicably discuss the issues in a private setting. As such, it would be necessary for the parties to bring the dispute to a court for a judge to make a determination on facts and evidence presented by the parties in dispute.

In litigation, if a party is dissatisfied with the finding of a judge, an appeal could be filed to the relevant Courts such as the Appellate Division of the High Court or the Court of Appeal.

In arbitration, an arbitrator’s finding cannot be appealed except in limited circumstances.

2. There is a public policy issue to address

When there are public policy issues in company law disputes or in disputes involving individuals, the Courts would be the place to go to as it is the judiciary that creates law. Arbitrators do not create law.

This is especially so if any policy of such is detrimental to either party. Having a judge address these in a public court not only ensures a fair decision but also helps to set a precedent through case law.

3. Either party does not want to arbitrate (or mediate)

Arbitration (and mediation, for that matter), can only take place when there is mutual agreement. If either party refuses these alternative dispute resolution methods, litigation is the way forward.

However, it is important to note that if the parties are contractually required to arbitrate or mediate, they can only pursue litigation if parties agree that litigation would be more appropriate to resolve the dispute.

Is Arbitration Always Cheaper Than Litigation?

It is a common assumption that arbitration automatically costs less than going to court, but this is not always true. Litigation generally has lower upfront costs since court fees are fixed and there is no need to pay for a decision maker’s time. Arbitration requires parties to pay the arbitrator’s fees and, if applicable, institutional administration fees on top of legal costs.

For straightforward, lower-value disputes, arbitration can end up costing about the same as litigation, or more. Arbitration tends to become more cost-effective relative to litigation as a dispute grows more complex, more technical, or more likely to involve a lengthy appeals process in court. The right question is not simply which method is cheaper, but which method avoids costs that do not add value to your specific dispute.

How Enforceable Are Arbitration Awards and Court Judgments

Enforceability often decides the outcome for cross-border disputes. Singapore is a signatory to the New York Convention, so foreign courts in over 170 member countries are generally required to recognise and enforce Singapore arbitral awards, with only narrow grounds for refusal such as serious procedural failure or a conflict with public policy.

Court judgments rely on reciprocal enforcement arrangements between Singapore and the country where enforcement is sought, which are narrower in scope than the New York Convention. This is one of the main reasons multinational businesses favour arbitration for cross-border commercial contracts, while domestic disputes without an international enforcement concern may not need this advantage at all.

Med-Arb a Hybrid Option in Singapore

Parties do not always have to choose one method exclusively. Med-Arb combines mediation and arbitration, where parties first attempt to settle through mediation and, if that fails, move directly into arbitration, often with the same neutral party involved.

This approach is increasingly used in Singapore to preserve the relationship-focused benefits of mediation while still securing a binding outcome if settlement talks break down.

Also Read: Litigation: Comprehensive Guide & Process in Singapore

Speak to Our Lawyers Today

Choosing between litigation and arbitration is rarely just a cost question. It depends on how much confidentiality your business needs, whether the relationship with the other party is worth preserving, whether you need an enforceable outcome across borders, and whether a court precedent actually matters to your case.

Getting this decision wrong at the outset can mean paying twice, once for the wrong forum, and again to correct course.

RBN Chambers, led by Ramesh Bharani Nagaratnam, advises businesses and individuals across Singapore on both litigation and arbitration, and will walk you through which approach fits your dispute before you commit to either. Reach out here to book a consult!

Frequently Asked Questions

Delivering Solutions not just Answers to your legal disputes

We provide solutions to all our clients regardless of the scale or complexity of the cases. Let us know how we can help.

Contact Us